|
Conquerors to bureaucratsbureaucracy ascendant, 1550-
Structure of colonial administration: audiencias, viceroys, corregidores, cabildos
Authority, flexibility, and stability: “I obey but do not comply.”
Church and the State: real patronato,
Regular (orders) and Secular clergy: from evangelizing to administering sacraments
Church and popular religion: Cult of the Virgin of Guadalupe
|
|
Theory of patriarchal rule:
From king to father and mother of family
Tree or spoked wheel (Burkholder and Johnson)?
Hierarchy vs. multiple lines of authority
|
|
Structure of colonial administration--mix of judicial, administrative, executivemodeled after Spain
Audiencias: high court of appeals, founded early as check on conquistadores and crown authorities
Viceroys: wide array of powers, limited by short terms
Corregidores, local administrator, tax collector, justice of the peace
Cabildos, town councils of the richest families; coopted, not elected
But no Cortes (regional parliament), unlike in Spain
|
|
Formation of Audiencias
Highest court in each region--executive, administrative & judicial
Centered on native pops., wealth
At independence (~ 1825), 11 became national capitals
|
|
Don Antonio de Mendoza (1490-1552)
Viceroy of New Spain, 1535-49“have special care of the good treatment, conservation, and increase of the Indians”
delayed enforcement of New Laws
“promoted” to Viceroy of Peru, 1551
|
|
Don Francisco de Toledo, Viceroy of Peru, 1569-81
5th viceroy of Peru, founder
Journeyed 5 years throughout VR.
Administered and legislated broadly
|
|
Authority, flexibility, and stability
Authoritarian structure checked by overlapping lines of authority
“Obedezco, pero no cumplo [I obey but do not comply].”--the freedom of distance (e.g., Mendoza declined to implement New Laws in New Spain)
Residencia, the end-of-term judicial review of injustice
Stability: persisted for 3 centuries, few riots or rebellions. Sale of offices weakened administration.
|
|
New Laws of 1542 (Charles I)
Designed to protect Indians and restrain encomenderos
Prohibited Indian slavery
Prohibited new encomiendas, inheritance of old ones
Provoked rebellion in Peru
|
|
Residencia of 1565 Mexico City
Indians complained to the authorities of abuses
Investigation detailed abuses
Oidores and encomenderos were occasionally jailed for abuses
|
|
Conspiracy of the Encomenderos, 1565-68 (New Spain)
Led by Martin Cortes sought to be Viceroy
Sought to extend encomiendas
Total defeat for encomenderos
|
|
One of the first visitadores of the Church (Peru)
“he showed himself to be a severe and just judge for he punished cruelly the haughty priests… Moreover he persecuted the witchdoctors and idolaters, destroying huacas and idols.”
|
|
Visitador Julio Lopez de Quintanilla
“was one of the most worthy visitadores of the church. He was a good Christian and friend of the poor, modest, humble and a good judge.”
|
|
Corregimiento
Used native
- town structure
- native caciques
Corregidor often purchased position with loans from merchants
Repaid with forced sale of goods to natives (repartimiento)
|
|
Clergy: regulars and secular
Church and the State: real patronato
- King controlled all clerical appointments and communications
- 1574: increased power of seculars, reduced regulars
Regular (orders), evangelizers, educators, administrators
Secular clergy: administered sacraments (baptisms, marriages, burials), thrived on parish fees
|
|
Fray Bernardino de Sahagún
Authored General History of the things of New Spain--12 vol. “encyclopedia” in Spanish and Nahuatl
Detailed ethnography of native customs, history, culture
|
|
Primer to teach writing to nativesMexico, 1569
Friars were the educators
Developed literate native elite (particularly in Mexico)
Some parish books were kept in Nahuatl until ~1650
|
|
New towns centered on churches
|
|
Ixmiquilpan, Hidalgo (Mexico)
Churches often constructed by native artisans
Murals in this church depict native views of the conquest
|
|
Friars administered to the sick and dying
|
|
Virgin of Guadalupe…said to have appeared Dec 1531 to Juan Diego
Virgin’s image imprinted on manta
chapel existed on hill north of Mexico City from 1556
first evidence on apparition dates from 1648
no conscious substitution of devotion to virgin for a native deity
devotion confined to criollos, 1648-1736
after epidemic of 1736-7, devotion spread
|
|
End
|